@WSJ predictable to a point, which is useless when it matters!
-
-
-
@librab103@WSJ US can keep announicing $1mn for Nepal-while people die- relief supplies/medicine/doctors r needed not dollars
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ it can happen anytime it doesn't mean that after every 80 years a earthquake will come to Nepal. Its just a stupid explanation.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ It's stupid explanation. No geologist nor any existing science can predict it with certainty.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ US can keep announicing $1mn for Nepal-while people die-relief supplies/medicine/doctors r needed not dollars-insensitivity precictble2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Always wiser after the event! Earthquakes & predictable?
@WSJ: How Nepal's earthquake was more predictable than most.http://on.wsj.com/1OU9zXMThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ That's like saying, "Well, I told you so."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ if it was so predictable... then why so many deaths?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@tulioalvarez Interesting ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.