@WSJ @nicole_hong This is a pro-terrorist article. What's wrong with using informants to nab extremist wackos who want to harm innocents?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@nicole_hong If some Islamist wacko is out there talking about joining ISIS or attacking, nothing wrong in using informants to get him.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@nicole_hong Nothing wrong in using informants. It's done all the time. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ can u say entrapment?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@nicole_hong The FBI has a long history of encouraging low IQ people into "plotting" attacks and then arresting themThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ So is ISIS. Which team do you really want more young Americans to join?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ better than ISIS luring vulnerable young peopleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ The lawyers need to leave the FBI alone so they can protect the American people this is crazyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I don't understand why it is illegal to join isisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ too badThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.