How about douche funds. “@WSJ: After years of uneven performance and image problems, hedge funds no longer want to be called "hedge funds"”
-
-
-
@Rotulin how about not, big dog.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That should improve returns
@WSJ: ... hedge funds no longer want to be called "hedge funds": http://on.wsj.com/1EYVG89 ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ know that sound and heat are electro magnetic and more at http://goo.gl/NWyPlUThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Who cares what they want to be called. Americans called them thieves and scammers! Doesn't seem to affect their behaviors.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@realrobcopeland that's dumb as hell. Let em hedge. HEDGE UP!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Mainly because they're mostly beta players highly correlated to indices. In other words, an investment in them is not a "hedge."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ That's because living on the hedge is just as precarious as living on the edge.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@realrobcopeland "Unwise Investment Funds".....eh? EH??Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ LOL... Like they say, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.