@WSJ @richardhine I think it would depend more on who the followers were than the numbers. Great many Twit accounts are crap/bots/both.
-
-
-
@anniegirl1138@WSJ exactly... politicians are as likely to get fooled by someone who's bought fake followers as journalists are :) -
@richardhine@WSJ More likely, imo. Politicians still don't really understand how Twitter works, which is why so many are so bad at it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ So now we're measuring qualification, worth, and competence based upon the # of Twitter followers? Sad.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BrianPardy Cracks me up.@WSJThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@richardhine I'd be more concerned about hiring someone unclear on proper usage of "less" and "fewer."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: Politicians hiring staffers who already have social media followings of their own: http://on.wsj.com/18OXtB9 pic.twitter.com/MoItniHHjq”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting
@WSJ: Politicians are hiring staff members who already have social media followings of their own: http://on.wsj.com/18OXtB9#ablegThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. RT “
@WSJ: Politicians hiring staff who already have social media followings: http://on.wsj.com/18OXtB9 pic.twitter.com/laG1QVxAD8”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Seems that this digital strategist needs an English lesson. It's "fewer" than 500; not "less" than...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@LibertyLynx I have almost 1000 followers. So what? -
@CTIronman Go to work! :)@WSJ -
@LibertyLynx@WSJ nope, already TNDO
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@stateofthecity@WSJ Shouldn't that be "fewer than 500 followers"?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ wow. Interesting.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ does this "strategist" use 'that' b/c she doesn't consider someone w/ <500 followers to be a person or b/c she doesn't know any better?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@WSJ I'd be nervous about hiring someone who says "less" when they mean "fewer."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: Politicians are hiring staff who already have social media followings of their own: http://on.wsj.com/18OXtB9 pic.twitter.com/UQEiyz3ZdE”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.