@WSJ @WSJThinkTank rich is when you can stop working and continue same life style until you die. Its not about amount. Its about freedom.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank $100k DEFINITELY isn't rich in my book...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank that's if you don't live on the West or East coasts.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank Nobody making $100K a year in LA, SF, NY, DC is richThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank it isn't worth it to make a 100k a year.. Taxes takes off alot... Loss of benefits... It doesnt pay to work.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank you don't make 100k+/yr without massive school debt and an urban location. Rent and interest is too damn high.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank $100k a year in NYC is only slightly above poverty. I don't think $500k a year is rich either.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank TAX! $100k is peanuts. I know a doctor that works 3 jobs in 3 different towns, he doesn't have a pot to piss in.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank that makes sense considering a persons W a salary of 100K has not enough $ 2raise 2children & a pay 4yr. college degreeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank it's all relative.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank this is the definition of#firstworldproblemsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ gertanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Wealth, like poverty, is relative."
@WSJ http://on.wsj.com/1Dj9lU6Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"
@WSJ: 46% of Americans making $100,000+ per year say you need $500,000 a year to count as “rich”" - They just keep raising the bar, huh? -
@nythingButMOODY Soon $100k will be the new $50k. Nice but not all that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank I would feel rich on 75k/yr and all the leisure time to enjoy the money. 500k/yr takes you out of wage slavery faster.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: 46% of Americans making $100,000+ per year say you need $500,000 a year to count as “rich”: http://on.wsj.com/1Dj9lU6 <in LA it's $1milThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ true. Also depends on where you live. NY versus FL for example.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ As a professional in the financial field I suggest that assets and retention of assets is a better meausring stick than income .Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@WSJThinkTank absolutelyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.