Any comments? >“@WSJ: Why Is Chad now fighting #BokoHaram? Cows and Diapers. An animated explainer: http://on.wsj.com/18lhVtU ”
-
-
-
@WSJ So Nigeria could not be bothered as long as oil production or price not affected by#BokoHaram :-(
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Lazy, lazy reporting and an offensive oversimplification that would only be utilized when describing an African nation.#CowsAndDiapersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Chad housed and provide logistic support to Boko Haram and that is why they never attack Chadpic.twitter.com/OuW4QygyPU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ maybe they don't want any kind of religious fight I guessThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.