“@WSJ: Roughly 16 million U.S. children - about 1 in 5 - received food stamps last year. http://on.wsj.com/1BF5OkM pic.twitter.com/ftZBxm1lF4” Impt
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
“@WSJ: Roughly 16 million U.S. children - about 1 in 5 - received food stamps last year. http://on.wsj.com/1BF5OkM pic.twitter.com/ftZBxm1lF4” Impt
What except widespread child poverty can happen when the middle class now can't afford kids - or at least not more than two? @WSJ
"@WSJ: http://on.wsj.com/1BF5OkM pic.twitter.com/SVYyZmN1T6” interesting that a traditional married couple is least likely to have food stamps...
@WSJ Show the graph of wages falling in connection with decline of unions. Show graph showing skyrocketing income for the rich since REAGAN.
@WSJ The GOP has a solution. It's called "Let them starve".
Terrible trend "@WSJ: A/b 16 mill US children - about 1/5 - received food stamps last year. http://on.wsj.com/1BF5OkM pic.twitter.com/01IZnMcArW”
@wsj Should photo ID be required? http://goo.gl/df2UAR
Unaddressed #Poverty is #Violence "@WSJ Roughly 16mil USchildren (1in5) received food stamps http://on.wsj.com/1BF5OkM pic.twitter.com/H4mxOtKz25”
@WSJ all children who received food stamps were leeches on society. Work for your food, filthy peasants
@WSJ that is why young people are not getting married today! They collect from the government to raise their children and live together!
@WSJ what does that say about marriage?
@WSJ Stop the madness. Way too many
@WSJ Real unemployment is 25%. These figures are the covert soup lines of Great Depression II. We are higher on the Misery Index than 1930s
@WSJ What percentage of food stamp recipients are just lazy fu*ks sucking the system dry?
Interesting: “@WSJ: 16 million U.S. children - about 1 in 5 - received food stamps last year. http://on.wsj.com/1BF5OkM pic.twitter.com/4IfYdq187r”
@WSJ Is it terrible that they need assistance or wonderful that it can be provided?
Probably both. http://www.DoAsISay.xyz
@WSJ China's stealing our American jobs & modern technology cost US economy & taxpayers $500 billion a year, which fully explained the chart
@WSJ And you have billions to spend on illegal wars! Wake up America!
@WSJ poor are likely to have more children, and hence the 22% is skewed. 22% of children but less than that of families
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.