@WSJ Federal funding shouldn't be used on murder.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ abortion is murder.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Republicans want smaller government but also the ability to tell a woman what to do with her body!
@WSJ -
@Akhenaten15@WSJ or protect lives of unborn babys
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ @SITNB why is the media silent over the delay in implementing the rule EAD for H4?? I guess legals have no value over illegals.sad...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ but congress still gives PLANNED PARENTHOOD $500 MILLION/year to kill babies! Take away the $500 million give 2 educate inner city kids -
@daynutrition@WSJ Lies. Planned Parenthood doesn't use federal funding for abortions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ The GOP needs a supply of unwanted and genetically damaged humans to enslave in private prisons.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ***yawn*** Can we please stop political pandering and get some REAL legislation done?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Already done. Is repealing alcohol prohibition next?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Rolling back the clock....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Again ashamed of being republican: you need to stop the meaningless war against abortion, everytime it sounds more like against womanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ There are many more important things that taxpayers money should be spent onThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: The House passed a bill prohibiting federal funding from being used on abortions: http://on.wsj.com/1CGEMIV ” And it starredThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ but that isn't what they were supposed to be discussingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ... since 1970. Why not include the former clause, Patriots?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah ummm VETO RT
@WSJ: The House passed a bill prohibiting federal funding from being used on abortions: http://on.wsj.com/1CGEMIVThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ 85054350Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ of course they did.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.