@Maggyw519 @WSJ Exactly.
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
@Maggyw519@WSJ Totally. As if the Royals are policy makers rather than celebrities, or anyone actually gives a shit. -
@docrocktex26@Maggyw519 last I checked, the royals don't even make policy, parliament does that;@WSJ shoulda done their homework. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@Maggyw519@vivajosiah@WSJ So much for lame dunk. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ@hrkbenowen Wow, we introduced the royals to our trash?pic.twitter.com/wrrY3wcmPx
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Obvs "
@WSJ: There was more discussion about the royals meeting Beyonce and Jay Z than Obama: http://on.wsj.com/1GdT9XQ pic.twitter.com/MEaSJNO34j”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only in America “
@WSJ: There was more discussion about the royals meeting Beyonce and Jay Z than President Obama:pic.twitter.com/msBqxkhVWW
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Obama is irrelevant. -
@gobospring So are you and the GOP. -
@JordanKorah What do I have to do with the GOP?#fail. -
@gobospring Your party. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ@BeyonceFans That lady staring at Beyonce not Kate Middleton lolThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: was more discussion about the royals meeting Beyonce and Jay Z than President Obama: http://on.wsj.com/1GdT9XQ pic.twitter.com/4Pv1kze3br”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.