@WSJ: Gives new meaning to "living with water" #sealevelrise $26 billion underwater project: http://on.wsj.com/1xExd6L pic.twitter.com/B93QDJhalZ”
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@WSJ: Gives new meaning to "living with water" #sealevelrise $26 billion underwater project: http://on.wsj.com/1xExd6L pic.twitter.com/B93QDJhalZ”
“@WSJ: Want to live underwater? Japanese construction firm pitches $26 billion project: http://on.wsj.com/1xExd6L pic.twitter.com/71TKhfBuqC” WHY
@WSJ Great! First we cleared out #forests n #AnimalHabitat for #humans to live. Now lets #invade the #SeaCreatures as well. #Development
“@WSJ: Want to live underwater? Japanese construction firm pitches $26 billion project: pic.twitter.com/7W9y5SwtLF” hell no
@WSJ while it may sound intriguing to some, it seems incredibly anti-ecology to me
@WSJ Thats MAD imagine looking out your window and seeing some mad #Sharks! #Dope #UnderDaSea
You predicted this @Randy_Gage: via @WSJ: Want to live underwater? http://on.wsj.com/1xExd6L pic.twitter.com/ADxM5ZbILa
@WSJ homes for billionaires...only.
@WSJ we know sea largest than land, 2 diveded 3 is sea in the next time could sea to be came land example singapura country buth need techno
“@WSJ: Want to live underwater? Japanese construction firm pitches $26 billion project: http://on.wsj.com/1xExd6L pic.twitter.com/ZXdmw9XP4j” WOW!
@WSJ okay I read it its different...lol
@WSJ seems like the money could be better spent, like on romantic songs to stimulate population growth and ultimately the economy
@WSJ stole my ideal I was writing/thinking about this I think it was a month or two ago or is that scribing or synchronized thinking...
@WSJ @lal_susheel I'm not sure what to think about this thanks
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.