@WSJ With a constant wave of undoc'd illegals flowing thru a porous border, how can a number be estimated, let alone declared 'stabilized?'
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ I'm crying "Bullsh*t" on this one. Something is wrong with either your data sources or your calculator. -
-
@NateWatkins@WSJ True. Anybody can do this, even news organizations. -
@NateWatkins@WSJ But, be very clear here, I'm not accusing WSJ of fudging numbers for a certain outcome. I like to think they're above that -
-
@NateWatkins@WSJ I'll have to check this out. Thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ@mirjordan I'd think the possibility of US poverty is still better than murder/Can't see why recession is deterrentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@mirjordan That is a fantasy statistic... Have you been to a border state lately? -
@CASuperrunner@WSJ@mirjordan you mean places like Arizona where the number of illegals has plummeted?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Oh let's not count the 200,000+ who recently slipped over the border. This is a good example of junk journalism by WSJ Stick to financeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ America is big enough to give these illegal immigrants home. Your forefathers went in the same manner.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Most of their kids are in the school system and the parents expect teachers to perform miracles without help from home.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Mr_James_Banana
@WSJ ah.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.