“@WSJ: New Cheerios: no more nutritious than old Cheerios. http://on.wsj.com/1nAVozm pic.twitter.com/bXSDlaLWOg” Less fiber, more sugar, more BS.
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
“@WSJ: New Cheerios: no more nutritious than old Cheerios. http://on.wsj.com/1nAVozm pic.twitter.com/bXSDlaLWOg” Less fiber, more sugar, more BS.
@WSJ No but band-wagon jumping, granola-crunching foodies will buy because it's hip.
Is this The Onion? RT @WSJ: The new Cheerios aren't more nutritious than old Cheerios http://on.wsj.com/1nAVozm pic.twitter.com/9dBB4c6OHG
@WSJ @deborah_donohoe Better question is whether this marketing campaign will rescue General Mills from broader lack of interest in cereal?
Beware Marketing:“@WSJ: The new Cheerios aren't more nutritious than old Cheerios, even if they are made with quinoa http://on.wsj.com/1nAVozm ”
'will be lightly sweetened “to round out” the taste" - I'm offended! I've eaten Cheerios since 4ever bc no sugar added. Disappointed! @WSJ
@WSJ #AncientGrains sighting. Grains from the Bronze Age. all dusty, covered in dirt and full of health. Love the #gambit
@WSJ How can one not be cynical about marketers and ad men?
@WSJ Has wheat in it so I won't be eating it. #wheatallergies
@WSJ Next big Protein trend: CRICKET PROTEIN: Check it out! : http://www.allthingsbugs.com
“@WSJ: The new Cheerios aren't more nutritious than old Cheerios http://on.wsj.com/1nAVozm pic.twitter.com/bRWAeUxhPI” #productpackaging
@wsj @bobingle99 Egads. Did not know anything wrong with the old cherios ???
@WSJ better off eating old fashioned rolled oats than some ersatz replica
@WSJ as long as long as the first ingredient is high fructose corn syrup it doesn't matter what else is in it your better off eating the box
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.