“@WSJ: Boeing now faces a future without fighter jets: http://on.wsj.com/1BQIhgl pic.twitter.com/sQLMuhkBZc” WW II BEAUTY !!!
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
“@WSJ: Boeing now faces a future without fighter jets: http://on.wsj.com/1BQIhgl pic.twitter.com/sQLMuhkBZc” WW II BEAUTY !!!
@WSJ Not a jet. Not then a part of Boeing.
@WSJ that P51 is absolutely stunning and equally effective. Best prop fighter ever built.
@WSJ It’s not worth tweeting if you’re going to block the content.
@WSJ they still own the tech data and the govt still has to buy from Boeing who subs out the contracts and still makes money but good try.
“@WSJ: Boeing now faces a future without fighter jets: http://on.wsj.com/1BQIhgl pic.twitter.com/OfruCQ9Mey” end of such a great era
@WSJ ノースアメリカン、ロックウェルインターナショナルと来て今じゃボーイングに登録商標が遷ってるんだもんね、航空業界再編の一端・・・・。
@WSJ So you show a P51 built by North American in a tweet about Boeing? How about a B17 or B29 instead? Boeing built those.
@WSJ / boeing rely now on nasa..
A p-51...neither a jet nor a Boeing RT @WSJ: Boeing now faces a future without fighter jets: http://on.wsj.com/1BQIhgl pic.twitter.com/dDCaAx54VX”
@WSJ I wonder if #Boeing would ever make furniture again. Little-known fact: http://www.boeing.com/boeing/history/narrative/n004boe.page …
@WSJ strange ants photos
اغرب صور للنمل ظ
http://www.el3omdames3da.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46 …
“@WSJ: Boeing now faces a future without fighter jets: http://on.wsj.com/1BQIhgl pic.twitter.com/RrBhi4cq0W” dronesssss
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.