I'll try to be less decisive “@WSJ: Certain bald men have a higher risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer: http://on.wsj.com/1wAFtnE ”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Already lost his hair. Now this? MT
@WSJ: Certain bald men have higher risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer: http://on.wsj.com/1wAFtnE -
@laflaca428@WSJ insult to injury....gladd I missed the whole bald gene thing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Now there's the bald truth. Slick piece of journalism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
UH?! “
@WSJ: Certain bald men have a higher risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer: http://on.wsj.com/1wAFtnE ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ...and with this tweet, you just kicked up bald men's fear several notchesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: Certain bald men have a higher risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer: http://on.wsj.com/1wAFtnE ” It isn't easy being bald
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Conclusion: premature to act on this information. No causal relationship found.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To add injury to insult“
@WSJ: Certain bald men have a higher risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer: http://on.wsj.com/1wAFtnE ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.