@WSJ It means that the executive branch will have yet another bat shit crazy to deal with!
-
-
-
.@nametyb
@WSJ Yea, since Pelosi, Rangel, Boxer are paradigms of sanity and virtue! Embrace the suck, follow your leaders advice. -
@AmericanGirl04@WSJ LMFAO, the entire system and all its followers are rotten to the core Fascists! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ#GOP, don't be stupid,#Cantor didn't lost because he supported#ImmigrationReform. To the contrary, he lost because he never act on itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: What David Brat's defeat of Eric Cantor means for the White House: http://on.wsj.com/TJnyKQ ” I hate incumbents, but this? Not sure...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ "'My concern is that a lot of things are going to be dead and pushed aside,' Rep. Peter King (R., N.Y.)" My hands doth wring as well!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@WSJ Better headline would be - what Brat's win means for WE THE PEOPLE.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ "His defeat could make GOP lawmakers less inclined to cut deals with Mr. Obama." DIG IT.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.