“@WSJ: http://on.wsj.com/1pjzBIR pic.twitter.com/xI5XlHOhuZ”
Los de más ingresos gastan 42% en casa y comida contra el 56% los de menos (% ingreso)
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
“@WSJ: http://on.wsj.com/1pjzBIR pic.twitter.com/xI5XlHOhuZ”
Los de más ingresos gastan 42% en casa y comida contra el 56% los de menos (% ingreso)
Top 20% of Americans spend 31% of their spending on housing vs. 40% for the bottom 20%. http://on.wsj.com/1pjzBIR pic.twitter.com/d4HZeCGl3h @WSJ
@WSJ can't see how this is news other than those with more money can more easily afford things. #Stayinschool, #getaskill
Maslow' hierarchy in action...“@WSJ: The top 20% of Americans spend vs. bottom 20%. http://on.wsj.com/1pjzBIR pic.twitter.com/dFuFT5Auyn”
@WSJ The problem with America, all these intellectual elitists attempt to classify and categorize instead of treating us like individuals.
@WSJ This implies the people with money are the top and those with less are the bottom? Is that prejudice?
@WSJ Still some people who say poor people are lazy and deserve poverty. Spending 40% of income on housing leaves little for anything else.
@WSJ we should hava large in oil daller yen euro
yen pound buy real east ever
@WSJ Does this represent wages only, or does it include programs like SNAP and Welfare?
@WSJ In China,a ordinary worker may spend more than a half of their income just for a house......
@WSJ Yet the poor spend the same % on entertainment? There's something wrong w that. Not saying it should be 0 either! #1stworldproblems
@WSJ if you calculate the amount in absolute numbers, 31% will be many times higher than 40% as they buy costly homes than average Americans
@WSJ The working poor on the bottom, have a difficult struggle. Too much was lost in the cash of 2008, that will take years to rebuild.
@WSJ do u pipl hav separate tweeter account where we can follow for getting news pertaining to my interest. You are flooding useless tweets
@WSJ what a mininal difference, that's astonishing
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.