@WSJ And they get the .89 from where?? Doesn't it make sense to, I don't know.....Round Up? Considering most people don't have .89 of a kid.
-
-
-
@DJTopherLee@WSJ it's an average, pal -
@ChrisJHardley@WSJ I know.... Glad someone could sense the sarcasm.... I took my statistics class in college.... -
@DJTopherLee@WSJ they probably should have taught you that! I hope it wasn't expensive! :) -
@ChrisJHardley broke the bank
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“
@WSJ: U.S. women are now expected to have 1.89 children over their lifetimes...how exactly do you have .89 of a child?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Yeah. My mom had .87 kids.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ That explains a lot about Billy. He's definitely a .87....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ My wife and I have 4 daughters, so we did our part to push up the average.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ better that wayThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ If women are expected to have 1.89 children over their lifetimes, what would a .89 child look like? Which part would be missing? Hmm...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: US women now expected to have 1.89 children up from 1.87 - apparently I live in a demographic blip area-know lots of larger families!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ how do you have 1.89 children? That's tricky!#wonderwomanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ almost two kids ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ No woman nor animal is capable of having a child that is 1.89.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ how do you have .89 of a child?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ what is .89 of a human being?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ it's going to be difficult to achieve that '.89'. But maybe#science can help us out on the "how".#thingsthatarentdivisibleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.