@WSJ I'm a way different person than I was 3 yrs ago when I finished college let alone when I was in HS. I don't think it proves anything
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ No, because it is not a good indicator of work ethic. I think in terms of pure aptitude yes but work ethic trumps aptitude alone. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ I would say it's a good thing to include as a factor. If they have the work ethic and drive to do well for the SAT, it carries over. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Hiring people is a skill, has standardized testing helped our education system? also depends on what your hiring for. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ what about ppl who didn't take SAT? I went to community college first. Didn't need it. -
-
@Mike_Pomatto@WSJ my masters degree & internships mean nothing. But a test I took when I was 17 really matters? Not a good business model. -
-
@Mike_Pomatto@WSJ I'm simply stating it's a poor business model and they would get some poor hires out of it. -
-
-
@Mike_Pomatto@WSJ You're right, so we should just assume their time and effort had been a waste of time. Hire the 17 yr olds!!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"
@WSJ: Should SAT scores be a factor in hiring? Share your thoughts with us. http://on.wsj.com/1cmKjqG " Glad they don't, I'd be unemployed. -
@ZachEClark@WSJ oh god, why even go to college? -
"
@Dsmarine7:@ZachEClark@WSJ oh god, why even go to college?" Well said, sir. Semi-defeats the purpose of higher learning. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.