“@WSJ: Are humans actually monogamous by nature? http://on.wsj.com/1g2rfQu ” Interesting article!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Menurut
@chevhe poligami kok «@WSJ Are humans actually monogamous by nature? http://on.wsj.com/1g2rfQu »Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Aren't humans naughty by nature? OPP!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A confused species? For me, polygomy is a deal breaker. >> “
@WSJ: Are humans actually monogamous by nature? http://on.wsj.com/1g2rfQu ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ 연구에 의하면 인류는 그 생물학적 특성상 일부일처도 아니고 일부다처도 아닌 그들 중간의 어정쩡한 상태랍니다.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ obviously not!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No RT
@WSJ: Are humans actually monogamous by nature? http://on.wsj.com/1g2rfQuThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Women no, Men YesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wsj Absolutely not! It is a conscious decision. Separates us from most animals. If U can't do it be upfront.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Note to all. This is not@TheOnionBagThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. RT
@WSJ: Are humans actually monogamous by nature? http://on.wsj.com/1g2rfQuThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.