OK, what now? MT @WSJ: Just 14% of SF homes attainable for those making area's median income. http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz pic.twitter.com/qb2p1WFcI6
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
OK, what now? MT @WSJ: Just 14% of SF homes attainable for those making area's median income. http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz pic.twitter.com/qb2p1WFcI6
@WSJ @Angela_831 Is anyone starting 2 realize that this rigged game is literally leaving 2 many out in the cold? #Banks
@WSJ @instapundit So don't buy one. Only 0 percent of Gulfstreams are available to me.
Insane RT @WSJ: Just 14% of #SanFrancisco homes are attainable for those making median income http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz pic.twitter.com/afDKEr9dnx
@WSJ yes this is why drugs cannot be legalized. Price drop would result in crash in Bay Area property values.
@WSJ the % might be lower for mumbai
@WSJ @KatrinaNation Can we give @NancyPelosi's home to a soup kitchen? This problem is literally in her back yard and she's done ... What?
@ScottSpiker now you know: “@WSJ: Just 14% of San Francisco homes are attainable .... http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz pic.twitter.com/oehN4GhppO”
@CaryRichardson define "attainable" $700k closet anyone?
@WSJ @HurlyMcDingus so, just 14% of San Francisco homes are thoroughly unhabitable and should be condemned, you say?
So, Kristallnacht? MT @WSJ: 14% of SF homes r attainable 4 those making area's median income. http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz pic.twitter.com/w46TeXP0JT
@WSJ "Just 14% of San Francisco homes are attainable for those making the area's median income"...& they wouldn't live in such a dump
@WSJ "attainable" being the key word. Wonder what that number goes to at "affordable" levels?
Jackson > San Fran. “@WSJ: Just 14% of San Francisco homes are attainable for those making the area's median income. http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz
“@WSJ: 14% of San Francisco homes are attainable for those making the area's median income. http://on.wsj.com/1kmirIz pic.twitter.com/Vvcexd0Bp2” 
@WSJ I wounder if that's the result of unemployed workers who lost those homes ? Math seems right.
@WSJ That's crazy. There needs to be incentives to buy more homes and households need access to loans that do no harm them financially.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.