@WSJ Could that be because IUD's are such efficient ABORTIFACIENTS? http://www.lifeissues.org/abortifacients/IUD.html …
-
-
-
@crispusmahea@WSJ such a credible source, wow. a source that says its sole purpose is to serve the pro life is not one to cite.#hellobias -
@emilyblair8@WSJ If I change my source, will you accept my point? Or will all my sources be biased if they don't say what you want to hear?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Scared to ask what an IUD is RT
@WSJ: Less than 1% of women who use an IUD become pregnant in 1 year, compared to 9% of women who use pillsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Which is why any female on welfare should also be fitted with an IUDThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An underused option: IUD. Less than 1% of women who use an IUD become pregnant in 1 year, compared... http://on.wsj.com/1jfmqt2 via
@WSJThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ 9% is still very low!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Yeah but that requires the responsibility of actually putting the IUD in and actually taking the birth control pills. Too burdensome!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@WSJ Also not $3k/year. Alert Sandra Fluke!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.