No shit - MT "@WSJ: Supreme Court rulings in India -consenting to sex "under a misconception of fact" isn't consent. http://on.wsj.com/1eAH7to ”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Sounds more than a little vague.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I can see how this ruling would be made- shows that the Indian culture is still very much a traditional oneThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@CChristineFair Fascinating! I believe this issue was behind the Clarence Thomas case - both parties 'sincere' in their opposing standsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Wouldn't work here. The DAs would never pick that up.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: Supreme Court rulings in India have held that consenting to sex "under a misconception of fact" isn't consent. http://on.wsj.com/1eAH7toThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ india has a long long way to go. No law is appropriate here. Biased and lacks conviction at best.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@wsj need a subscription to read this articleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.