“@WSJ: U.K. judge orders The WSJ not to divulge names in #Libor probe. http://on.wsj.com/16j5ZAO ” @c_aashish have to read it on print then.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ spend enough time thinking you're above the law or above another citizen and you've got the UK government. Same with GCHQ, NSA, Wall StThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: U.K. judge orders The Wall Street Journal not to divulge names in#Libor probe. http://on.wsj.com/16j5ZAO ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ That only applies to WSJ Europe I would guess. Hard to stop its printing in the US. -
@MichaelJames357@WSJ Actually, just heard that the UK correspondent(s) could be fined/jailed if WSJ "prints" elsewhere. -
-
@MichaelJames357 Not sure how exactly to feel about this. There was said to be concern that people would be named who would not be charged. -
@Maj_Kong If the media wants to adopt a standard of not naming people until they are charged, I'm all for that. But it can't be a one-off. -
@MichaelJames357 Great point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ 50 ways to help the#planet and care the#water http://50waystohelp.com RTThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.