Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
WSJ's profile
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
Verified account
@WSJ

Tweets

The Wall Street JournalVerified account

@WSJ

Breaking news and features from the WSJ.

New York, NY
wsj.com
Joined April 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The Wall Street Journal‏Verified account @WSJ 26 Sep 2013

    No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors:http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM 

    7:28 PM - 26 Sep 2013
    • 169 Retweets
    • 44 Likes
    • Nadya Zhexembayeva Diego🌹 Elad Kehat Colin Davitt Chris E. Haroian Javed Alloo danielle englert Tony Kellenberger JavierMedinaCuellar
    48 replies 169 retweets 44 likes
      1. MITSloan Boston‏ @mitsloanboston 29 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        @WSJ @abdaum #Watson wins #Jeopardy, #Google driverless cars, now #RaceAgainsttheMachine in the operating room! @amcafee @erikbryn

        0 replies 3 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Victoria dK‏ @vicandradeg 26 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        “@WSJ: New: robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors: http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM ” @medicinefact @andrestroya90

        0 replies 2 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Ray Howald‏ @Raezorrn 28 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        “@WSJ: No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors: http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM ”

        0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Doctor Dog‏ @dogmd4444 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        @WSJ Good luck to all involved when the patient arrests on the table.

        0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Jess Wood‏ @Jwood036 26 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        Proud! “@WSJ: No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM ”

        0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Michelle‏ @MichelleO145 26 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        “@WSJ: No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of... http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM ”@Mir_Amthor

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Michael Forman‏ @dmforman 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        “@WSJ: No more anesthesiologists? http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM ” - No wonder they are calling this a jobless recovery!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. BauceTrader‏ @BauceTrader 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        @WSJ @cornoptions1 I imagine you would still need a doctor to oversee the machine in case there were some malfunction...would be a nice job.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. alan snitow‏ @asnitow 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        So they can put us to sleep + takeover RT @WSJ New machine would have robots give patients anesthesia instead of docs http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM 

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. ninα dαοud‏ @shebatherapy 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        Nope. RT @WSJ No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors: http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM 

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Hans Harbers‏ @jharbers 26 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        OMG! @WSJ: "No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors": http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM 

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      3. diana van Iterson 🐰‏ @dianavanIterson 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @jharbers

        @jharbers wat een gesimplificeerde weergave van ons werk... We werken trouwens in het verkeerde land:600-2000 dollar? Really?

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Hans Harbers‏ @jharbers 27 Sep 2013
        Replying to @dianavanIterson

        @dianavanIterson Ja, belachelijke kop natuurlijk! Gaat bovendien over sedatie; stel je voor dat wij daar zulke bedragen voor rekenen...

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. Hana‏ @hanarima001 26 Sep 2013
        Replying to @WSJ

        No. “@WSJ: No more anesthesiologists? New machine would have robots giving patients anesthesia instead of doctors: http://on.wsj.com/1746UIM ”

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info