@WSJ Why don't they just do away with criminal backgrounds then? Whats the point of them if they can't be used???
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“
@WSJ: California city bars city contractors from asking about many job applicants' criminal histories http://on.wsj.com/16qUU3n ” Silly law.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ not a great move. If it's job related, question can be asked in BCThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ these guys have paid their debt and deserve to take care of themselves and family. I would give them a chance.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ California elects crooks why should this be any different?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WTH...“
@WSJ: California city bars city contractors from asking about criminal histories http://on.wsj.com/16qUU3n ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like it. “
@WSJ: California city bars city contractors from asking about many job applicants' criminal histories http://on.wsj.com/16qUU3n ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ How is that possibly legal? Company could hire dangerous escaped felon. -
@oldbaldeagle@WSJ Exactly. Job related questions should be permitted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Oh those sneaky Libs. Can't not hire criminal. But Libs will be there to sue you when those criminals harm others while in your employ -
@winojanet@WSJ plus ER is liable for behaviour of employees
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.