@WSJ Probably because Obama is the laughing stock of the international community! He's too soft!
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ A serious blow to relations between US and Russia? Wasn't very good anyway... -
@mysports1 well that's the point. Obama was supposed to fix that - guess not -
@dougmcole Apparently not enough "flexibility" he had promised to the Russian ambassador before the 2012 election. -
@mysports1 great call, I'd forgotten that statement
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ : it is!!! Russia should have taken a step backward and should not have interfered in Snowden's case. Of all people they should know itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Citizens see US lawmakers negligence as unacceptable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@jjauthor#SnowdenAssylum Another failed deal by this failed politician A real Gangsta from the streets of Chicago could have done betr -
@soldotnastan I am surprised we haven't had him "eliminated". Makes me think the administration wanted the leaks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ how you liking the middle finger Congress..?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: U.S. lawmakers see Edward Snowden's asylum in Russia as serious blow: http://on.wsj.com/17m45PE ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.