Telling tht this wil b news 2 many in news “@WSJ:Lo-wage workrs least likely 2 acept employr health benfts - 2 xpnsv http://on.wsj.com/15BDsXt ”
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ not only are plans expensive, they are usually cut rate & 1 employer will cover same sex couples, not 20 yr common law heterosexual - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ The American health care model and application is a hodge-podge of benefits and varying costs by jusrisdiction, a complete mess.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Are you confused? If they are employer provided how then do they cost employee? Another reason we need public option - costs less.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: Low-wage workers are the least likely to accept employer-provided health benefits. If only there were subsidies. Oh, wait ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Did the Koch Brothers fund this article?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ - this sounds like nothing more than more Republican bullshit propaganda planted in WSJ to discourage support for ObamaCare - SHAME!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ So people with little money are least likely to buy something expensive? How insightful. -
@nickchodge@WSJ the waste, thus cost is inflated price & overprescribed drugs and tests. This nurse says health starts with your choices.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Does this take into account low-wage workers who use their spouses' plans?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.