@ArtursSaburovs @WSJ: Free to read: Latvian vote reflects ambiguity over euro http://on.wsj.com/10SIbkC ” interesting read...I thought
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
@ArtursSaburovs I didn't agree with it either but I always get excited when Latvia is mentioned in the news.
#Latviaisthebest
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ@johndstoll well this article is obviously wrong!many lies!we didn't vote for joining euro in a referendum!We had a language referend. -
@mikscelmins@WSJ Latvians voted up EU accession treaty in 03 - binds them to adopt euro as soon as it complies with convergence criteria -
@johndstoll@WSJ yes we did vote for the eu in 03 but the article informs there was a referendum last year to adopt euro! Well there wasn't -
@mikscelmins@WSJ our story said: Latvians voted to join the euro a decade ago in a referendum. -
@johndstoll@WSJ alright! My bad !
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Lally68 “@WSJ: Free to read: Latvian vote reflects ambiguity over euro http://on.wsj.com/10SIbkC ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@johndstoll stupid to publish an article like this with no clear evidence and lies!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@johndstoll and it does not reflect any ambiguity! It does not change the fact to join euro! This is so bad! -
@mikscelmins we made the point in the story that it does not change the fact that the euro will be likely adopted in January.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.