@WSJ Whoopee and so on, and so on. Grow up and stop crime already. If would put more people to work also.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ Whoop-dee-frickin-doo! Law abiding citizens won't own magazines w/10+ rounds, criminals will. How does that help reduce violence?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ carry more magazines no problemThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: Proposed Conn. gun-control laws include a ban on magazines with more than 10 rounds. http://on.wsj.com/Z52nxD ” How does this help?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ WHAT part of NO INFRINGMENT do the Politicians Not Understand. NO means NO.. -
@AlwaysWatchnDFW@WSJ Oooh pahleese...go load your musket...it is those that oppose background cks & bans THAT should NOT have guns! Psychos
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ I bet the criminals are totally going to follow this. -
@mnitowski@WSJ Tired old argument on bad guys-All can become BAD w/gun-Ban & TAX them! Less guns=safer society like 3rd world countries! -
@rubymagic@WSJLive yup, and less forks = more fit society!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ so I guess a lunatic will only be able to kill 10 people..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.