@The_Alex_Acosta“@WSJ: In 2012, Samsung spent $401 million advertising its phones the U.S. Apple spent $333 million. http://on.wsj.com/X4AC8u ”
-
-
-
@dericg11 I'm not sure how this correlates to my argument on options. You can take the best OS and (cont) http://tl.gd/la1kss -
@The_Alex_Acosta 1 it being the best os is a matter of opinion 2 the post was primarily in response that you said more androids been sold
-
@dericg11 So you agree they sold more and I'll agree they spent more on advertising? Seems cut and dry Souly. -
@The_Alex_Acosta lol no, SAMSUNG spent more on advertising yet apple had more in sales...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: In 2012, Samsung spent $401 million advertising its phones in the U.S. Apple spent $333 million. http://on.wsj.com/X4AC8u ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: In 2012, Samsung spent $401 million advertising its phones in the U.S. Apple spent $333 million. http://on.wsj.com/X4AC8u ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT
@WSJ: In 2012, Samsung spent $401 million advertising its phones in the U.S. Apple spent $333 million. http://on.wsj.com/X4AC8uThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: In 2012, Samsung spent $401 million advertising its phones in the U.S. Apple spent $333 million. http://on.wsj.com/X4AC8u ” felt like itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.