@WSJ
Feds will spend over $40 trillion in next ten years. Sequester is peanuts. Good managers should be able to absorb cuts w/o problems.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ:#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT VIDEO”@leesh2118 here's your explanationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ:#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT VIDEO”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ:#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT VIDEO” LESS MONEY, DUHThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ:#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT VIDEO” - educate oneselfThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ:#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT VIDEOThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT
@WSJ#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications. http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT -
Thanks for sharing
@MeganHealey: RT@WSJ#Sequester 101: an explanation of what it means and its implications. http://on.wsj.com/VjLKBT ”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.