RT @WSJ On March 1, $85 billion in federal spending cuts are set to begin. Proposed alternatives to the sequester: http://on.wsj.com/YJduO7
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ WSJ deliberately not reporting the Onama plan?Equal spending cut and tax increase. A balanced plan and yet ignored by WSJ. Shame on youThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: On March 1, $85 billion federal#spendingcuts set to begin. Proposed alternatives to the#sequester: http://on.wsj.com/YJduO7 ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ you mean an $85 reduction in pre-planned spending growth. Sequester is not a "cut", as that would mean actually spending less.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Really hope you do a story about Obama's plan to prevent#sequester. Here are details: http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/02/22/conservative-media-ignore-obamas-sequester-plan/192778 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.