@WSJ I don't know how something this ridiculous could ever stand up in court. People need to get a life!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course what can't you sue for? “
@WSJ: If a man is served a contaminated hamburger but doesn't eat it, can he sue for emotional distress?”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LT
@WSJ then that would be the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard ofThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Yes, of course.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. “
@WSJ: If a man is served a contaminated hamburger but doesn't eat it, can he sue for emotional distress? http://on.wsj.com/Yb37Cw ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: If a man is served a contaminated hamburger but doesn't eat it can he sue for emotional distress? http://on.wsj.com/Yb37Cw ” ridiculousThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL!!! What next?RT
@WSJ-If a man is served a contaminated burger but doesn't eat it, can he sue4emotional distress? http://on.wsj.com/Yb37CwThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ :what a stupid question. Of course he can, the question is, whether or not the judge will hear the case.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ He should at least get his money back. But, if he didn't eat it why does he think it is contaminated? With what? The answer is NO!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ not in negligence. The argument wouldn't stand as there is no actual damage apart from pure economic loss (Hedley Byrne v Heller)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Can he sue? Maybe. Should he be lawfully able to sue on those grounds? I say no. Too many lawsuits with exaggerated distress.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@WSJ: If a man is served a contaminated hamburger but doesn't eat it, can he sue for emotional distress? http://on.wsj.com/Yb37Cw ” @dsbergerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ :We put our trust in fast food places but we have to observe what we will be eating before even taking a bite.Smell if You have toThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ If I don't subscribe to WSJ, but their article sucks, can I still sue? -
New conversation -
-
-
He can sue, but he's not a man. RT
@WSJ If a man is served a contaminated hamburger but doesn't eat it, can he sue for emotional distress?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ cannot subscribe. Can the final judgement be posted here? -
“
@SAbhivyakti:@WSJ cannot subscribe. Can the final judgement be posted here?”That's valid question
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.