@WSJ Well if a 2.5% change in DNA takes you from Ape to Man does .01% accuracy make Michael Jackson sound like Kid Rock?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ DNA wasn't interesting as a storage mechanism, but as a parallel processing potential. it would need serious retrieval performanceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ excellent article!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Try to get your head around that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.