@WSJ glad to hear that people are still reading more!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ e-readers weren't a revolution; they were part of an evolution that filled a gap as multi-purpose "tablets" became more affordable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ It's not over...I'm just not running to replace my kindle that works fine! That article was dead on!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Not a revolution--just an alternative--most readers will own one but still buy real books (especially non-fiction with photos)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ yes. Books never go out style!!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ No. We're just clearing out the riffraff.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Might not be over but folks still crave the real thing. I find myself w/2 e-readers but still buy hard copies for my library.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Hope so I cant stand reading books like that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Perhaps we're tired of paying insane prices for ebooks, have exhausted Gutenberg and the other reasonably priced alternatives?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ e-readers need to just be included in a tablet. It needs to be multi-functional to survive. I love my#kindlefireThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.