@WSJ so "short periods," like what, two or three years?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ . . no, it just affects me . . . Check, please! lol!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Did anyone ever think it really did cause any harm to the babies? I find it mind boggling that we needed a study to know this..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Yes. Millions of women 4 millions of years have known this instinctively.Don't need study.Women know.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I don't like this idea and did not try this method. To sleep is not something to teach.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ WHO THE HELL STUDIED THIS?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ@NicoleGenova@MikeGenova @danigenova13 -
@NMD526 clearly lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
RT
@WSJ: Study: Letting babies cry for short periods while teaching them to sleep doesn't cause long-term harm.http://on.wsj.com/S3aLtPThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.