@WSJ this article is useless, as the answer given to every question is that they haven't done any research. WTF, WSJ.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ no answers in this articleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ ''we still have no idea'' should have concluded the title ''how dangerous is a dirty grill?''. I haven't learned anything.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Disappointing that the answers to the marshmallow and grill mark questions were that they hadn't tested for those items.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
America-haters
#MaoStreetJournal@WSJ Is a blackened marshmallow as bad as charred meat? How dangerous is a dirty grill? Carcinogen science: -
@BourbonBigot
@WSJ A communist newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch! Who would've thought!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@WSJ I thought this article was going to tell me if I shouldn't eat blackened marshmallows. And it didn't! :(Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
黒いマシュマロって炭化した肉と同じくらい良くないの?汚いグリルの危険度は?発ガン物質の科学 RT
@WSJ Is a blackened marshmallow as bad as charred meat? How dangerous…http://on.wsj.com/Q22ri0Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ I will bet the marshmallow taste better then the charred meatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ Eating damaged cells = not goodThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.