Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
WSJ's profile
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
Verified account
@WSJ

Tweets

The Wall Street JournalVerified account

@WSJ

Breaking news and features from the WSJ.

New York, NY
wsj.com
Joined April 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    The Wall Street Journal‏Verified account @WSJ Oct 9

    Opinion: The progressive imperialists are now trying to regulate digital commerce nationwide under Sacramento rules, and the good news is that the Justice Department is pushing backhttps://on.wsj.com/2Pn4FKN 

    9:20 AM - 9 Oct 2018
    • 32 Retweets
    • 72 Likes
    • Allison Meyers Geetha Ramamoorthi Thomas W Murphy Marxelinus IrishMom Mike Breslin Tom Culbert HLC CHRONIC PAIN ADVOCATE ♿ Liliana Japón
    17 replies 32 retweets 72 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        Let's start with the headline. "California Breaks the Internet" This is categorically false click bait. "Sacramento wants to regulate the web nationwide." This is fear mongering. I want to regulate taxes nationwide. I have the same power to do that as CA government. None at all.

        1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
      3. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        Now, the picture. It's showing people protesting in support of nationwide #NetNeutrality regulations. Supporters of Net Neutrality protest the FCC's decision to repeal the program in Los Angeles, November 28, 2017. PHOTO: KYLE GRILLOT/REUTERS

        1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
      4. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        The refusal of the author of this opinion to sign their name to this work is troubling. Is this just a cheap ploy to try to imply more than one person on the editorial board holds a similar opinion?

        1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      5. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        "The progressive imperialists are now trying to regulate digital commerce nationwide under Sacramento rules, and the good news is that the Justice Department is pushing back to protect the free flow of information and the Constitution’s separation of powers."

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      6. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        Name calling and false claims are such dignified and auspicious choices for the first paragraph. Congratulations to this author for such a strong start! The FCC which had the best claim to protecting the free flow of information declared it had no such power earlier this year.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      7. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        As for separation of powers, the states retain all powers not explicitly granted to the Federal government. After repealing the FCC regulations and declaring they didn't have the power to enforce them in the first place, it's unclear how they can restrict States' rights.

        1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      8. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        The statement about DoJ is inverted reality. The suit is literally to prevent a state from enforcing its laws on businesses operating within the state. This is an effort to prevent another state from protecting the free flow of information.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      9. Chris Ely‏ @tcely Oct 9
        Replying to @tcely @WSJ

        "Providers are prohibited from throttling, blocking or charging to prioritize content. California’s law goes even further than the Obama rules by banning “zero-rating” plans that exempt certain apps from consumer data limits." That sounds like free flowing information to me.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      10. 10 more replies
      1. TheAtrium985‏ @TheAtrium985 Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        LOL. The "imperialists" trying to regulate commerce in their own state... Didn't the GOP used to be a state's rights party? What happened? (I know the answer, of course: money to themselves, and their friends, is the only thing they've ever cared about...)

        0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Alejo Marquez‏ @AlexRMarquez Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        I like how we can’t see who the original author of this piece in order to hold accountable the opinion in the first place. But again it’s just an opinion and you can either agree or disagree. I disagree.

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Richard F Marlatt‏ @MarlattRichard Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        Shame on the WSJ for posting this Trump propaganda using verbiage that obscured what it’s really about: Net neutrality vs Control over the Net by big business interests.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Totterdown Andy‏ @TotterdownAndy Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        Without net neutrality, you won't exist. It's as simple as that.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. ConservativeMe‏ @ConservativeMe4 Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        The only reason the left wants to regulate the net, to control the flow of information people receive.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. marty kubalanza‏ @aznalabukm 22h22 hours ago
        Replying to @WSJ

        Yes good nes

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Sherwin Chow‏ @Yichuan1 Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        Are you supporters of Trump’s anti-net nutriality regulations? Then please explain!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. joe swift‏ @frothyfroth Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        And they want Seal to live in ocean

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Tim Berry‏ @tberry1501 Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        Interesting, you must not believe in Net Neutrality or individual freedoms or one person one vote. You back Citizens United & dark pools

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Kerry‏ @RbKerry Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        No net neutrality is like a land grab. You lose.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. indigoctarine‏ @indigobjects Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        Destroy the propaganda machine!

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Jonny 5ive‏ @JonNYC5ive Oct 9
        Replying to @WSJ

        "Progressive imperialists"... It's like your editorial board doesn't know how to use words.

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info