When Aun San Suu Kyi get a ban and Haague? It's her government, her responsibility.
-
-
-
Are you crazy? How can a government without arms go against a whole regime of soldiers? It is like asking an unarmed man to fight against a man with a gun.
-
You are delusional, she's the head of the government. The president is the member of political party led by her. It means she can give ORDER to the military. She supported by the US, so it's partly US responsibility for situation in Myanmar.
-
If it was as easy as that we wouldn't even be poor lol. She has no power since she doesn't have any weapons. Our army doesn't work that way lmao. They believe and actually do anything they want since they got the guns. Bro you actually thought our army would listen to Suu Kyi.
-
Then all she has is support of USA. It means the country can go out from the US sphere of influence. You are poor democrats and bad liberals, bro. Myanmar should serve better to Washington. Ban all generals from "Facebook" and "Twitter", it makes them cry like a babies, 100%.
-
Yes bro, I believe their socials(Facebook etc) have all been taken down, and they have already been sanctioned from some banks, but understand bro we will never let the US intervene, just look at what happened to Afghanistan and Syria. "Once they set foot, they will never leave."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's solely the army doing such deeds, please stop framing the whole country as culprits. It will be the same logic as condemning the whole Germany of 1945 for the atrocities of the Nazis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
VK takes the right decision
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.