Anyone else find it odd that the branch that nominates a SCOTUS judge can also executively withhold vital info abt that judge? Seems like, a rather glaring blind spot in our controls and checks and balances.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Release obamas records and we'll release kavanaughs
-
Try Google. Behind Hillary, the second most vetted human in the history of the world.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
This is reassuring. With the right congress (cough, cough) maybe we don't have anything to fear.
-
I had been researching the issue since West Virginia impeached judges. Everyone talks about lifetime appt, however, NO ONE, not even judges, ARE ABOVE THE LAW.
-
Amen to that!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tomorrow, tomorrow I love you, tomorrow You're only a day away!


#RedactedFISA#QanonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They released 500,000 documents for everyone. The remaining documents are withheld by executive privilege from GWB. This isn't a "Trump" thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be It Known: Anyone who votes YES for Kavanaugh, will get a BIG NO from us in November!
#VoteRepubsOUT -
Surely you’re not a one issue voter
-
Surely not! Nice try.
-
So a Senator could vote Yes for Kavanaugh and you might vote for him/her anyway.
-
Esl much?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
all docs must be released before the confirmation proceedings can continue.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
no, i think i would lose that bet.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
i know. i dont like it. hope they can somehow get enough na votes. and i won’t bet on this either.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.