No, more federal regulation is NOT needed. The airlines need to get a backbone and put a stop to this foolishness themselves.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do too. People have NO IDEA HOW HARD FLYING IS FOR ANIMALS




- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They want to discriminate against pit bulls,even though every single government study found that,unless owners make them aggressive,pit bulls have no more propensity to bite than any other breed. Rottweilers are still wild&think of a baby as prey. Ban on Rottweilers is reasonable
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If you are emotionally unstable enough where you need a emotional support animal....you dont need to be flying in the first place. Suck it up and get help dont expect everyone else to go out of theor way to accomodate you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about people who are allergic to dogs and cats? Their rights should not be infringed on because you want to bring your pet on an airplane.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I saw a lot around Florida - people with their 'security dogs' everywhere. What about people that have been traumatized by dogs in the past? Why should THEY have to be NEAR dogs at all? Nevermind a 3 hr flight after PAYING for the seat. One in-law is allergic to pet hair.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not gov'ts job.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.