I believe “editors in chief” is the proper way to pluralize “editor in chief.” 
-
-
-
Dude, we're talking BuzzFeed and HuffPost here. It's not like it's the Wall Street Journal!
-
Lol. I just felt like the irony of a story about journalistic integrity with a grammatical error in the headline was too funny to pass up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it's "editors in chief", or simply "chief editors".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BUZZFEED? Questioning
@DailyCaller




Granted I loooove my "35 pictures of Tom Hardy for 35 years of Tom Hardy" newsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YOU GUYS ARE QUESTIONING SOMEBODY ELSES JOURNALISTIC STANDARDS - ARE YOU TRYING TO BE FUNNY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Buzzfeed and huff post are the LAST organizations that need to try and call out anyone over their journalistic standards. Those two are the intellectual equivalents of toilet paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you get your news from facebook you have no one to blame but yorself
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Buzzfeed and HuffingtonPost? Is that a joke?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AND ANOTHER THING... Presenting that hack oppo research dreck "dossier" as news AFTER McCain wiped his ass with it...?
#FakeNewsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.