is there a way you could not post opinions on this account and just post them on a different account that I can then not follow?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So glad I cancelled my
@WSJ subscription. -
I am smarter I never subscribed to this hate-rag!
-
Haha. My boss suggested it and company paid for it. I still canceled it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wrong! History will remember where you stood here. The WSJ is endorsing a decision right up there with Dred Scott and Korematsu. SHAME!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this is why the
@WSJ editorial board is the laughing stock of all media everywhere possibly even ranking lower than the entirety of Fox News.pic.twitter.com/zgSNurybepThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SCOTUS Justices are there to follow the constitutionality of EXISTING law NOT to be Reconstructionist Progressives to write new laws!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be careful you do not become a print version of FOX news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you oppose the travel ban please supply the following: 1) Reasons we should trust Iranian & N. Korean vetting. 2) A method to vet people coming from countries in "Mad Max" levels of civil collapse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Opinion: 5 Justices opt to ignore enforcing the constitution and instead try to re-write it with their votes. Should've been 9-0.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Upholding a travel ban that is a pretext for excluding Muslims somehow insures the “ability of future Presidents to defend the country?” No, insures that we all get the message that Republicans are firmly in control of the Supreme Court. “Defending the Constitution.” Ridiculous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too bad they won’t defend the Constitution against
#TrumpThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Democrat justices' disrespect for the Constitution & its separation of powers is palpable. They won't stand up for 1st amendment. No religious liberty values. Kagan should know better. Sotomayor maybe not cuz of affirmative action.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Opinion; republican stolen scotus seat pays off nig for business and bigots
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow..WSJ...who'd a thought?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.