This is a painfully dishonest and misleading "accounting", which does it's best to "account" for the benefits of fossil fuels, but makes no effort whatsoever to honestly account for the costs. To market this as a cost/benefit analysis is really weak.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
someone got some money from someone else, to publish a biased review of a bullshit paper paid for by the oil companies. this is not even an opinion, it's advertising concealed as a blowjob.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is shameful, even for you
@WSJ. Perhaps there's a story about children being ripped from parents and put in cages that you could pursue?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Compared to burning wood, of course. But as our society develops better alternatives, it’s time to let them go. After all, Stone Age didn’t end because we ran out of stones.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly cannot tell the difference between this piece and something published by the onion. Argument about less dying from the cold is absurd. Thanks for the laughs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does for us fishermen! Ha.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fake news
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, how compeletly inept can the WSJ be.. calling now to cancel.
@WSJThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just canceled my subscription because of this editorial. Thanks for the good articles over the years! Will miss reading
@mimsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Negative comments here from rabid Greeners using the benefits of fossil fuel technologies, while not refuting facts of article, are beyond hypocritical, sad sad sad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the face of it, this sounds short-sighted. What about the benefits of a plastic litter field in the Pacific reported to be five times the size of France--or Texas, for that matter? It's not a trick question.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Got a pic showing the size?
-
I have something better: real science, including the sampling methodology. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w … … My apologies: it is 3 times the size of France not 5. It must be my dyslexia creating fake news... Over to you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.