So trade “ownership” of land from one group of thugs with no authority to another group of thugs with no authority? Got it!
Isn't "authority" just someone with the ability to coerce?
-
-
Nope. There is a scam that they are somehow legitimate and right to rule you. No one grants them such a right. The constitution is not authorizing anyone because it is not a contract. Same for any Constitution, including California’s. I referenced “No Treason.” Please rebut it.
-
I don't agree with your connection between legitimacy and authority. After all Authoritarians usually govern via force and without consent. The less consent the less legitimacy perhaps so "authoritarians" are often the least legitimate and it's the same root word.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.