It should be clear to anyone not blinded by ideology that the fossil fuel industry must be phased out fast. This means demand would exceed supply, which means FF execs and investors would reap profits, grotesquely. This suggests a use case for nationalization and rationing.
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Assets should simply be seized. There is something deeply unethical about investors cashing in on irreversible climate breakdown. That was their decision, that was their risk, and that is on them.
2 vastausta 46 uudelleentwiittausta 261 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
This might require new legal frameworks. But if there were ever a time requiring new legal frameworks, it is now.
4 vastausta 15 uudelleentwiittausta 148 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
It will also require a changing of the guard: Replacing those humans currently in power (who care more about propping up the fossil fuel industry than life on this planet) with new humans in power (who care). Which of course requires a strong movement, which is what we fight for.
3 vastausta 27 uudelleentwiittausta 186 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Keep in mind that it is all about humans, and social contracts, both written and unwritten. Those social contracts are about to change dramatically, one way or another, because of climate and ecological breakdown. Maybe a good time to start thinking outside of the box.
2 vastausta 29 uudelleentwiittausta 161 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
Agreed & the status quo is going to collapse at some point under the weight of the #ClimateCrisis, the harder element is getting progress on CO2/CH4 before that collapse.
Oil money runs DC including both parties, but a credible mass movement can create change despite that.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.