Typical Misdirection on your part. owned "OR REGULATED" That is what they are proposing. And just like that - your argument crumbles..... I'll wait. Understand that those running are making wild statements - but it all leads to telling YOU HOW TO LIVE YOUR LIFE! #LeadRight
-
-
No. Socialism is actually a thing. The word has a meaning. Look it up. Regulation is not socialism. And do you really thing we should not have regulations?
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
When it says regulate, it isn't talk about making sure you have enough sand in the septic hole. They are talking how to regulate, as in control, your life. Your suggesting 1b2. Socialism is 1b1 where government determines outcome. That's like strike 5 or 6.pic.twitter.com/ifqsLXMYUs
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Its GOP trying to regulate personal decisions. And any common sense jurisprudence tells you that in any actions that impact anyone else, there must be regulation. I can stick my fist out as far as I want until I hit your nose. Right? Are you some ideological fanatic?
5 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Everyone will be paying not just the top tier but everyone rich and poor will have to pay 70 to 90 percent. Then they redistribute it to others. This is classic Collectivist government control. You have stuck yourself into the ideological hole of your party.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
No one is suggesting this. This is your Fox News fantasy.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Really how does it feel to run smack dab right into the wall know as VoteBigJim. I'm told by other Dems that it hurts. Don't worry I'll help pick up Humpty Dumptys pieces. James Baldini for Congress. http://www.VoteBigJim.com
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Sorry bubba but you are drunk on ideology. Sophomoric fanaticism. Starting from your ridiculously broad definition of socialism - to the notion that single payer insurance is a gov takeover of healthcare - it’s just not worth unpacking for a man-child like yourself.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
I'm sorry I went to sleep before I saw that. Personal attacks - so adult of you. And I'm the "man-child". Haha. Overly broad-. That's Google's definition. Not mine. And sorry pal, there are lots of doctors who DO NOT accept it. What a great way to start the day Thanks. Hahapic.twitter.com/00KMjUDUyH
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Sorry again but your fringe examples do not disprove the rule - and providers are still private. And if we use your definition of socialism then any civil society with rules is socialist. It is meaningless.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Fyi, NOT fringe examples. Your ignorance is dangerous to society. There are specialist and GPs which won't even give you the time of day. Please stop pushing these lies. The ridiculousness of your arguements. It's Google's definition. Not mine.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
