How would the presence of make-work inefficient federal jobs solve this issue?
-
-
En réponse à @LibertariaNYC
I’m guessing by the phrasing of your question this is not a good faith inquiry but a federal jobs guarantee is a safety net and a guaranteed alternative to whatever work situation you’re facing, which would force existing employers to have to *try*
2 réponses 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
En réponse à @VoteAshcraft
I don't think that works. The jobs guarantee would only provide a real alternative to low-wage unskilled labor positions. Most of those have a known pay rate often keyed to the minimum wage. It's middle class jobs and up that require negotiation with specialized skills.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LibertariaNYC @VoteAshcraft
Unskilled is a term used by companies so they can steal from workers. It has literally no meaning.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @Harrington_HC @VoteAshcraft
The meaning is that the person you hire has no preexisting skills or specialization relating to your product or service. If I build a new factory and I need to employ someone to haul boxes, I will look to hire based on various factors, but not prior experience in hauling boxes.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Experience in hauling boxes in not going to be much of a skill. It means perhaps the difference between half a day of training and a full day. Now, if you had to go to school for 4 years to be an engineer and I need one, then I would have to limit my search to skilled engineers.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @LibertariaNYC @Harrington_HC
When “unskilled laborers” stop working, our economy collapses. Period. Workers of all skill levels are the backbone of this country, and trying to minimize their value is exactly why people are forced to work 2 full time jobs to feed their kids.
2 réponses 3 Retweets 6 j'aime -
En réponse à @VoteAshcraft @Harrington_HC
I don't see how I'm minimizing their value. I'm trying to describe the economic context. Indeed a federal jobs guarantee would minimize some of their value because it would cause inflation in consumer goods.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
This just shows you haven’t read any of the scholarship on the JG. The program is designed to be a counter-inflation automatic stabilizer lol... like we are challenging the very assumptions and framing that make up the economic context being offered
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
It would specifically lead to wage inflation and run up the cost of consumer goods. I didn't say inflation overall.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
“Wage inflation” as in employers being forced to pay a living wage or they’ll lose their employees to better jobs? Sounds good to me!
-
-
But do you care about the sticker wage or about the purchasing power? I submit you probably should care about the latter, which some would lose a lot on.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
I’m guessing you’ve never heard of
@JeffBezos the richest guy in the world who fired Chris Smalls for demanding the safety of his coworkers during COVID. I’m not going to further entertain the poor billionaire CEOs having to raise costs to still provide affordable services2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.