Bitcoin had to have a fixed supply. It was new. Without it, no one would have trusted it or trusted its value. You have to respect & acknowledge that. But that only means ETH couldn't exist w/o BTC coming first. It doesn't mean that ETH has to have a fixed supply.
-
-
There are huge number of differences between the fed and any crypto's issuance, even the shittiest of premined shit tokens. Most notably: choice & consent. Go deeper.
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Except that Fed has way smarter people while Eth bros haven’t even had their Econ 101 classes.
-
But Bitcoin Bros have?

- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The FED isn't the least bit decentralized, Ethereum's rough off-chain consensus is
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
nah mate we dont like the fed
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You could argue the other way. If ETH is needed to access its economy, directly or via a proxy like DAI, then comparison to the dollar isn't a bad one. To access the US economy you need USD, and its thus the global reserve. Q is how big the Eth economy can be
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Do people think ethereum is useful still? Grow up
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.