I hear quite often that having a 21M limit is really important, and that Eth should adopt it if it wants to stand a chance at getting any SoV status. And yet, when I've asked people in the ETH community how important it is the response is typically "eh, not that big a deal".pic.twitter.com/WhlpU5SwQV
-
-
So you agree with Craig Wright...
-
I also agree with Craig Wright that drinking water is good for health!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They are trivial in your hypothetical, but they haven't don't it yet.
-
Technologically trivial, not socially trivial. Which is my whole point.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
#UASF will fork off sha256 -
yes please:) ill sell my kidney to buy Decred if UASF like that happens! Bitcoin dominance will take a hit that other sound alts will benifit from af
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is not confiscation this is censorship. Miners cant confiscate my coins. Censorship is expensive and improbable to maintain.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This is like saying money is a shared illusion The social contract is important but it develops around the protocol which supports individual decisions within the social contract If the pools do such a thing, individuals can point away. (Also Stratum 2 and betterhash)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What year is this, 2017??
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If that happened it would be neither voluntary nor "free market". Bitcoin's social contract 'says' you don't censor transactions.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.